Couple Longevity in the Era of Same-Sex Marriage in the United States.Couple Longevity in the Era of Same-Sex Marriage in the United States.

发布者:邱娜发布时间:2015-04-28浏览次数:19


Rosenfeld, Michael J. 2015. “Couple Longevity in the Era of Same-Sex Marriage in the United States.” Journal of Marriage and Family Vol 76: 905-918.


Previous studies show that same-sex couples are less less stable compared with heterosexual couples in the United States. The author used a new longitudinal data set, the How Couples Meet and Stay Together surveys (N=3009), to come up with the first nationally representative comparison of same-sex couple stability and heterosexual couple stability in the United States. He coined term “marriage and marriage-like relationship”, which includes cohabitation or civil union among heterosexual couples and interpersonal commitment among same-sex couples, and used it as an important perdictor variable. He discoveries that reports of same-sex relationship instability in the past were due in part to the low rate of marriages among same-sex couples. After controlling for marriage and marriage-like commitments, there is no statistically significant difference between the break-up ratefor same-sex couples and that for heterosexual couples. The results revealed that same-sex couples who had a marriage-like commitment had stable unions regardless of government recognition. However, that does not mean that state recognition of marriage is not necessary. It actually brings a pathway to higher marriage rates among same-sex couples.


既有研究表示,在美国,同性恋夫妻的稳定性不如异性恋夫妻。作者采用了新的纵向数据库——夫妻是如何相识和相处的(样本总量为3009)来进行第一个全国范围内的样本分析。他用“婚姻和类似婚姻关系”来包含除去婚姻关系之外的异性伴侣亲密关系(比如同居、公民结合civil union),以及同性伴侣的多样性关系(比如双方私下承诺)。研究发现,之前之所以觉得同性恋伴侣不稳定是因为同性恋结婚的比率低。通过控制“婚姻和类似婚姻关系”变量,作者发现同性伴侣的分手率和异性伴侣相比,并不具有显著性差异。这项研究告诉我们,无论是否得到政府的认可,如果同性恋伴侣彼此之间有与婚姻类似的承诺,她/他们的关系一样是相对稳定的。当然,政府出台的同性婚姻合法条款确实提高了同性恋选择结婚的比率。所以,我们也不能一概否认政府认可婚姻的重要性。